Good governance mocked!

One of the saddest realities that confronted me while serving the government for sixteen solid years is seeing with my two naked eyes, supposedly government “servants” turn abusive, arrogant, high-handed, and totally unprofessional individuals mocking good governance.

Look around you. Look around your work place. They are lurking there. Plain-looking people pretending to be important to cover up for deep-rooted insecurities and utterly lack of skills. Pathetic. Why are they in government in the first place? Your guess is as good as mine. What a disservice to the government.

You can be sure their favorite past time is sowing and peddling intrigues poisoning the environment of the work place. I totally pity the office they are in. What a rotten office atmosphere they would create and inhabit. Woe to the rest of mankind.

Not only that, they congregate in small groups to form a power base. Ah, people and their insatiable love for power. These small-minded mediocre supposedly government servants think that by creating a power base through a group of like-minded scoundrels, they have become a powerful clique and a force to reckon with. Such insipid thoughts.

With their lack of brilliance (will they ever have one?), they will never know that power comes from within. But what do they really know apart from name-dropping, passing second-hand information, and exploiting government resources? Small wonder the younger employees – those who are supposed to be guided and mentored – get totally disillusioned about good turned “bad” governance. Poor kids.

What a sad reality in government. Public servants turned rotten eggs. Good governance mangled, mocked, and ridiculed by the very people working in it. And how do they do this? Simple. By conveniently leaving the office during office hours, in groups served by a government vehicle to do their personal errands including a visit to the parlor! Not only that. They have themselves driven to their homes in the guise of official trips. And mind you, a one-way trip to their hometown consists of a two-hour land trip from Gen. Santos City. Calculate the fuel consumed for these so-called official trips to serve the whim and caprice of abusive government personnel (to transport them to their hometown), multiplied by the number of days a government vehicle is used for a year, and you will see how much they have corrupted government funds.

On top of that, these erring government servants also use government vehicles after office hours and during weekends for their “other” activities. And they stay in government facilities as well, in the guise of being itinerant workers for years! Give me a break. Seven years of government aid because you can’t find your own boarding house? Pathetic. Always at the mercy of government? They are probably our modern day nomads.

Oh well, that is good governance mocked. Rotten government workers paying lip service to good governance. What a shame. You should be ashamed of yourselves! In fact, you should resign from government. The government sector does not deserve you.

You are a mockery to good governance.

Note: This article was originally written as a newspaper column in February, 2007.

What a dilemma

What a mockery!

It’s funny how the tables have turned against GMA. One day you persecute your political enemies; the next day, you get persecuted. We never learn.

But what do we call this relationship? Compassion tempered with justice? Vindication or purely vindictiveness?

I have never been a fan of GMA but that humiliation was grave. It was similar to the humiliation that Erap went through when he vacated Malacanan Palace. It was disgraceful. It was cruel.

Are we happy now? I’m not happy. That’s not what justice is all about. The camp of GMA availed of legal measures and remedies to enable her to seek medical treatment abroad. Well, her family has the resources to do that unlike poor Juan de la Cruz, but even then, they followed and respected the legal process. We cannot fault them for believing in the judicial process.

Now, some would say it’s easier said and done because the SC is composed of people she appointed. That is another story. The SC maybe perceived in that light by some quarters and it’s not very flattering. In fact, it is altogether derogatory and diminishes the prominence of the institution. In lay man’s language, it sucks! The SC is supposed to be independent and beyond the reach of politics. Sadly, the institution has been tainted with partisanship.

But then, the SUPREME COURT has spoken. So why is the lady in dilemma not listening, pray tell? Why is she mocking the SC? For that matter, why is the executive branch mocking the SC?

When will the circus ever stop?